Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council (18 011 184)
The complaint
- Mr B complains the Council took enforcement action against him for council tax arrears that were not his
What I have investigated
- I have investigated the Council’s actions from 2018 onwards.
- I have not investigated the actions of the Council between 2004 and 2006. The final section of this statement contains my reason for not investigating this part of the complaint.
- I have not investigated the actions of the Court. The final section of this statement contains my reasons for not investigating this part of the complaint.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. If we are satisfied with a council’s actions or proposed actions, we can complete our investigation and issue a decision statement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 30(1B) and 34H(i), as amended)
- We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
- We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered:
- Mr B’s complaint and the information he provided;
- documents supplied by the Council;
- relevant legislation and guidelines;
- the Council’s policies and procedures; and
- the Council and Mr B’s comments on a draft decision.
What I found
- Council tax is a local tax levied by local authorities. The amount a resident pays in council tax is based on the resident’s property band. Properties fall into one of eight bands according to their value on 1st April 1991. Resident’s in band A pay the lowest amount of council tax, and those in band H pay the most (Local Government Finance Act 1992).
- Billing, collection and recovery of unpaid council tax is governed by the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992, SI 1992/613.
- Council’s issue demand notices yearly. The Council must include specified information with demand notices.
- Council’s must send the person liable for payment of council tax a reminder and a notice before taking recovery action.
- Recovery action is through the issue of a summons and getting a liability order through the magistrates’ courts.
- There is no time limit to take action once a liability order is granted; the Limitation Act 1980 does not apply (Ridgeway Motors (Isleworth) Ltd v ALTS Ltd (2005 EWCA Civ 92 A)).
What happened
- This chronology includes key events in this case and does not cover everything that happened. Events between 2004 and 2006 are included to provide context.
- In April 2004, Mr B moved into property A.
- The Council received a council tax questionnaire saying Mr B was the occupier of property A from April 2004. The landlord’s agent also told the Council, Mr B had taken on the tenancy at property A.
- In June 2004, the Council sent a demand for council tax to Mr B at property A.
- In August 2004, the Council sent a reminder letter to Mr B at property A.
- Mr B sent a single occupant discount application form to the Council.
- In September 2004, the Council asked Mr B to complete a council tax questionnaire.
- In October 2004, the Council sent Mr B a revised council tax bill. The Council sent this to Mr B at property A.
- In December 2004, the Council sent Mr B a reminder notice to property A.
- In January 2005, Mr B was summoned and a liability order was granted in February 2005.
- The Council passed the debt an enforcement agent.
- In March 2005, the Council sent Mr B a council tax bill for the financial year 2005/06. The Council sent this to Mr B at property A.
- In May 2005, the Council sent Mr B a reminder notice to property A.
- In May 2005, a new tenant moved into property A.
- In August 2005, the Council sent Mr B a council tax bill for the financial year 2005/06. The Council sent the bill to Mr B at property A. The bill was not returned to the Council.
- In October 2005, the Council sent Mr B a reminder to property A. The letter was not returned to the Council.
- In May 2006, the enforcement agent told the Council property A had a new tenant. The enforcement agent said this tenant had lived a property A since 2005. The new tenant told the enforcement agent property A was empty for a couple of months before she moved in. The enforcement agent told the Council it could not trace Mr B and had closed the case.
- In January 2006, a summons was sent to Mr B at property A. The case went to Court and a liability order was granted in February 2006.
- The Council passed the debt to an enforcement agent.
- In May 2006, the enforcement agent returned the liabilities associated with property A for the financial years 2004/05 and 2005/06 to the Council.
- In 2018, the Council undertook an exercise to collect old debts. The Council passed Mr B’s debt to an enforcement agent to trace and collect.
- In July 2018, Mr B contacted the Council. Mr B explained he did not live at property A when the debt accrued.
- At first, the Council believed the enforcement agent had traced the debt to the wrong person and put a hold on enforcement action. However, when Mr B wrote to the Council to complain about enforcement action, the signature on Mr B’s complaint letter matched the signature on the single occupant discount application made in August 2004.
- Mr B says, during this investigation, he received more information about the exact date the debt accrued. Mr B says he now realises he is liable for the debt. Mr B says he will pay the money owed.
Analysis
- The Council decided Mr B was liable for the outstanding council tax debt for property A for the financial years 2004/05 and 2005/06. In 2004, the Council was told Mr B was a tenant at property A. In May 2005, the Council was informed the tenancy had changed. The Council had no evidence Mr B ended his tenancy earlier than May 2005. Indeed, the Court was satisfied Mr B was responsible for the debt incurred and issued two liability orders. The debt was not pursued after 2006, because the enforcement agent could not trace Mr B.
- In 2018, the Council passed the outstanding council tax debt to an enforcement agent. The enforcement agent traced Mr B and began enforcement action to recover the debt. The enforcement agent was entitled to take enforcement action as the Court had issued Mr B with liability orders for the debt. The Council is not at fault for passing the debt to an enforcement agent.
- Mr B contacted the Council to say he was not liable for the debt. The Council took this into account and put a hold on enforcement action. When Mr B complained to the Council about enforcement action, the signature on the letter matched the signature on the single occupant discount application made in August 2004. This is evidence Mr B was living at property A in August 2004 and within the period the debt occurred. The Council is not at fault for continuing to pursue Mr B for the debt.
- After receiving more information about the exact date the debt accrued, Mr B accepts he is liable for the debt
Final decision
- I have completed my investigation and not upheld Mr B’s complaint. I did not find fault with Council’s actions.
